SoC
  • Home
  • Arm
  • Arm Cortex M0/M0+
  • Arm Cortex M4
  • Arm Cortex M3
  • Contact
Reading: Is Arm Really Faster Than X86?
SUBSCRIBE
SoCSoC
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Arm
  • Arm Cortex M0/M0+
  • Arm Cortex M4
Search
  • Home
  • Arm
  • Arm Cortex M0/M0+
  • Arm Cortex M4
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Looking for Something?
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us
© S-O-C.ORG, All Rights Reserved.
Arm

Is Arm Really Faster Than X86?

Graham Kruk
Last updated: September 17, 2023 9:13 am
Graham Kruk 8 Min Read
Share
SHARE

The answer to whether Arm is really faster than x86 is not straightforward. Both processor architectures have their strengths and weaknesses. However, in recent years Arm has made significant advancements in performance that rival x86 in many workloads. The key factors to consider are:

Contents
Power EfficiencyClock SpeedsInstructions Per CycleBranch PredictionOut-of-Order ExecutionCache MemoryVector ProcessingMultithreadingCore CountsManufacturing ProcessPerformance per DollarPerformance per WattCustomization and IntegrationEcosystem SupportConclusion

Power Efficiency

Arm processors are designed to be power efficient for use in mobile devices. Using less power enables longer battery life. The Arm architecture uses a reduced instruction set computer (RISC) design that requires fewer transistors. This makes Arm chips smaller, cooler running, and more energy efficient than x86 Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC) chips. The focus on power efficiency gives Arm an advantage in performance per watt.

Clock Speeds

x86 processors traditionally had much higher clock speeds than Arm. A 4 GHz x86 CPU was common whereas Arm mobile chips ran below 2 GHz. However, thermal constraints limited how fast x86 chips could run before overheating. In recent years, Arm has closed the clock speed gap with high-end Arm server CPUs now boosting beyond 3.3 GHz. While x86 still has a clock speed advantage, Arm has reduced the disparity.

Instructions Per Cycle

Along with clock speed, a key determinant of processor performance is how many instructions can be executed per cycle (IPC). Complex x86 CISC chips can execute more instructions per cycle which compensates for lower clock speeds. RISC Arm chips execute fewer instructions per cycle. However, thanks to architectural improvements, latest high-end Arm processors like the Cortex-A78 can achieve up to 4 IPC nearing x86 levels.

Branch Prediction

Branch prediction is a technique used to minimize pipeline stalls by speculatively executing instructions ahead of branches before the direction is known. Arm originally lagged behind x86 in branch prediction capabilities. But new Arm designs greatly improved predictive abilities to be comparable to x86. Neoverse N2 cores have a Branch Target Address Cache to accelerate branch speculation.

Out-of-Order Execution

Out-of-order execution is used to prevent pipeline stalls by executing instructions in parallel or re-arranging order when data dependencies allow it. ARM historically performed in-order execution which sequentially processes instructions. But starting with Cortex-A15, ARM added out-of-order capabilities. The Neoverse N2 even has a 512-entry reorder buffer exceeding many x86 designs.

Cache Memory

Larger cache improves performance by reducing latency of fetching data from main memory. x86 processors traditionally had larger L1, L2, and L3 cache sizes compared to Arm chips for mobile. For example, latest high-end x86 chips may have 24MB L3 cache versus 4MB for mobile Arm. However, Arm’s cache has been steadily improving. The Neoverse N2 has 64KB L1, 1MB L2, and up to 64MB L3 system-level cache comparable to x86 servers.

Vector Processing

Vector processing allows a single instruction to execute mathematical operations across multiple data elements in parallel. Intel AVX and ARM Neon are respective vector extensions. Neon was less powerful than AVX giving x86 an advantage in HPC and AI workloads. But new ARMv9 architecture adds SVE2 to significantly improve vector performance rivaling AVX-512 in computations per cycle.

Multithreading

Multithreading enables a processor to switch between threads to keep more cores utilized. Both x86 and Arm support simultaneous multithreading to execute instructions from different threads in parallel. However, Arm typically has offered fewer threads per core such as 2-way SMT versus 4-way on high-end Xeons. The latest Neoverse N2 matches x86 with 4-way SMT.

Core Counts

Higher core counts allow more operations to run in parallel. X86 chips historically packed more cores on a single die because Arm was focused on power-constrained mobile SoCs. For example, Intel Xeons may have up to 40 cores while Arm mobile chips had 4-8. However, new server-focused Neoverse designs match x86 with up to 128 cores planned for next-gen.

Manufacturing Process

The manufacturing process node determines transistor density. Intel was long ahead in x86 fabrication technology enabling greater performance at lower power. But Arm chip designers like TSMC and Samsung have caught up or surpassed Intel reaching 5nm while x86 remains stuck at 10nm. The level playing field in manufacturing allows Arm performance to keep pace.

Performance per Dollar

ARM chips excel in delivering better performance per dollar. ARM-based processors are cheaper as intellectual property that can be licensed and manufactured by many semiconductor fabs. The competitive market for Arm chips results in lower pricing. In contrast, x86 CPUs are only made by Intel and AMD. Arm’s cost advantage allows more cores and features at a lower price point.

Performance per Watt

The ultimate benchmark is performance achieved within a fixed power envelope. ARM’s historical advantage has been delivering higher compute efficiency than power-hungry x86. The flexible RISC architecture and competitive manufacturing means Arm excels in embedding powerful yet efficient processors into everything from mobile to servers. So performance-wise Arm has caught up to x86 while maintaining a superior performance per watt.

Customization and Integration

ARM’s licensable business model allows processor designs to be customized for a target application. SoC integrators can add or remove features to optimize Arm cores for their workloads. Tight integration with on-chip accelerators saves power and boosts performance. In contrast, x86 CPUs are general purpose making them less customizable for specialized tasks.

Ecosystem Support

The ARM ecosystem was historically targeted at low-power mobile applications rather than servers and PCs. Software support and optimization for the architecture has lagged behind x86. However, as ARM penetrates the data center the ecosystem is maturing quickly. Microsoft now supports ARM chips enabling edge computing scenarios. The open RISC architecture also benefits Linux adoption.

Conclusion

In summary, ARM and x86 each have unique advantages that make them suitable for different applications. However, thanks to architectural improvements, fabrication advancements, and ecosystem maturity, ARM has achieved performance and compute efficiency rivaling top-tier x86 processors across a wide range of workloads. So while blanket claims that “ARM is faster” may be oversimplified, the innovation of the past decade in ARM performance merits serious consideration alongside x86 in modern computing.

Newsletter Form (#3)

More ARM insights right in your inbox

 


Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Will Arm Outperform X86?
Next Article Arm Cortex M1 Architecture
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2k Followers Like
3k Followers Follow
10.1k Followers Pin
- Sponsored-
Ad image

You Might Also Like

Differences between debugging Cortex-M1 and Cortex-M3 processors

Debugging any microcontroller can be challenging, but debugging ARM Cortex…

4 Min Read

Dynamic Interrupt Priority Changes on Cortex-M3/M4

The Cortex-M3 and Cortex-M4 microcontrollers allow for dynamic changing of…

6 Min Read

Arm Programming Software

Arm processors power technology that's transforming the world – from…

11 Min Read

Configuring timers and GPIO for interrupt latency testing

The key to measuring interrupt latency is utilizing the ARM…

9 Min Read
SoCSoC
  • Looking for Something?
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account